2025-03-28

2024.08 submitted
11.18 with editor
12.16 under review
There have been several changes in time in between, and the manuscript was sent to more reviewers.
03.05 minor revision (Only two reviewers accepted and provided very minor comments, didn't expect the editor to directly give minor revisions)
03.17 revision submitted
03.19 with editor
03.23 decision in process
03.28 accept

2025-03-27

What's the situation now, has it been resubmitted for review?

2025-03-18

It has been two months since the revision was submitted to the journal, and it has not yet reached the editor. Is this normal? It's agonizing.

2025-03-17

It has been 4 months since submission, one of the two reviewers has provided feedback, but the other reviewer has been silent for over 60 days, it feels like they have disappeared. The editor also hasn't invited new reviewers, it's really frustrating.

2025-03-14

Submission of initial draft on 2024.10.01
10.09 with editor
11.01 under review +1
11.04 under review +2
11.19 Required reviews complete (2)
12.06 decision in process
12.15 Major Review
1.18 submitted
1.19 with editor
1.25 under review
2.10 Required reviews complete (1)
2.23 Minor Review
3.5 submitted
3.6 with editor
3.14 accept
From initial draft to acceptance took less than 6 months. Both reviewers were very nice, with one having no comments and the other providing suggestions for structural optimization, requesting the article to showcase innovation and increase critical analysis. The feedback was very helpful for optimizing the article. It underwent major revisions for the first time. After revisions, minor edits were made to improve grammar and add practical discussions, and it was accepted within a week. The processing speed has improved after changing editors, leading to a longer overall waiting time, but it was worth it.

2025-02-22

It's too slow... I applied in December and didn't get rejected until mid-February. Can't they reject me faster? The review process is also too slow.

2025-02-20

I have been rejected, but fortunately it didn't take too long to be rejected.

2025-02-20

Submission on January 20, 2025,
Under review by the editor on February 2,
Decision in process on February 20.
Doesn't it look like it's going to be rejected?

2025-02-15

Excuse me, OP, should the formatting revisions be kept as well? Or is it sufficient to only keep the textual revisions?

2025-02-07

2024.1.10 Submitted to the journal
2024.1.17 With editor
2024.7.20 Revision submitted to the journal
2024.7.21 With editor
2024.10.20 Revision submitted to the journal
2024.10.21 With editor
2025.1.7 Revision submitted to the journal
2025.1.8 Accept
The review process for this article took a relatively long time.